MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077873576 · doi:10.3749/canmin.50.5.1197

STRUCTURE AND TOPOLOGY OF DUMORTIERITE AND DUMORTIERITE-LIKE MATERIALS

2012· article· en· W2077873576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Materials scienceMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dumortierite, ca . (Al,□)Al 6 (BO 3 )Si 3 O 13 (O,OH) 2 , has a complex and unusual crystal structure that is shared by several minerals and an increasing number of synthetic materials, which we group together as dumortierite-like materials (DLMs). Dumortierite has a strongly pseudo-hexagonal orthorhombic structure based on rod-like double-chains of Al octahedra in a framework based on the {6·4·3·4} semi-regular planar tiling. The large hexagonal channels contain chains of face-sharing Al octahedra attached to the framework by rings of SiO 4 tetrahedra. Smaller triangular channels contain planar BO 3 groups, while in other materials the triangular channels are occupied by tetrahedral or pyramidal groups. Holtite and magnesiodumortierite are isostructural with dumortierite, while ellenbergerite, phosphoellenbergerite, ekatite, and the synthetic materials have very similar structures to dumortierite, but with hexagonal symmetry. These minerals and materials differ from one another in the identity of the metal cations occupying the framework and face-sharing chains, and in the tetrahedral, pyramidal, or triangular groups within the hexagonal and triangular channels. We write the following structure-generating function, which describes both topological and stoichiometric properties of DLMs: X ( M 2 Φ ) 3 ( T h Θ h 3 θ h ) 3 ( T t Θ t 3 θ t ) where X is the face-sharing hexagonal channel octahedrally coordinated site, M is the framework octahedrally coordinated site, T h and T t are three- to four-coordinate cation sites in the hexagonal and triangular channels, Φ is a four-coordinate anion site, Θ h and Θ t are three-coordinate basal anion sites, and θ h and θ t are one- to three-coordinate apical anion sites. We discuss various structural and crystal chemical properties of DLMs, illustrating their commonalities as variations on the theme described by the structure-generating function. We also discuss three closely related structures which involve modifications of different geometrical or topological aspects of the DLM structure: the structure of lyonsite and its synthetic analogues, the structure of satterlyite and holtedahlite, and the structure of the AB polytype of the cancrinite group of feldspathoids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it