MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077884301 · doi:10.1144/geochem2014-289

Pyrochlore and columbite-tantalite as indicator minerals for specialty metal deposits

2015· article· en· W2077884301 on OpenAlexafffundabout
D.A.R. Mackay, George J. Simandl

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsColumbitePyrochloreGeochemistryMineralogyGeologyMetallurgyChemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyrochlore supergroup and columbite-tantalite series minerals can be used as indicators for specialty metal deposits. Their mineral chemistry can be used to target specific specialty metal deposit-types and provide a vector towards mineralisation. A ternary Nb-Ti-Ta discrimination diagram for the pyrochlore supergroup shows that minerals from carbonatites and related deposits occupy the pyrochlore field and extend slightly into the betafite and microlite fields (>35% Nb, <65% Ti, and <45% Ta). Those from peralkaline complexes define a narrow zone paralleling the Nb-Ti join (>40% Nb, <60% Ti, and <10% Ta). Pyrochlore supergroup minerals from Li-Cs-Ta enriched (LCT) pegmatites occupy the microlite field (<90% Nb, ≤40% Ti, and > 15% Ta) whereas those from peraluminous granites plot in the microlite field along the Nb-Ta join, extending slightly into the pyrochlore field (<65% Nb, <10% Ti, and >35% Ta) on the Nb-Ti-Ta ternary diagram. The discrimination diagram for pyrochlore supergroup minerals is based on 349 new electron microprobe analyses from British Columbia and Québec, Canada, combined with 879 published analyses from 50 deposits worldwide. A columbite-tantalite series discrimination quadrilateral indicates that minerals from carbonatites and related deposits are Nb-rich, with Mn/(Mn+Fe) and Ta/(Ta+Nb) atomic ratios ≤ 0.25 and ≤ 0.20, respectively. Columbite from peralkaline complexes plot along the FeNb 2 O 6 –MnNb 2 O 6 join of the quadrilateral and have Mn/(Mn+Fe) ratios of ≤ 0.65 and Ta/(Ta+Nb) ratios of ≤ 0.15. Fe-Nb-rich varieties within this zone slightly overlap with those from carbonatites. Columbite-tantalite series minerals from Li-Cs-Ta (LCT) pegmatites and peraluminous granites are not well constrained but do slightly overlap with columbite-(Fe) from carbonatites. A minor overlap exists between the fields from carbonatites, peralkaline complexes, LCT pegmatites, and peraluminous granites near the columbite-(Fe) corner of the quadrilateral. The discrimination diagram for columbite-tantalite series minerals is based on 153 new electron microprobe analyses from British Columbia combined with over 2500 analyses complied from the literature. Combining the two discrimination diagrams presented here enhances their effectiveness to explore for specialty metal deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Exploration Environment AnalysisSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207