General quantum fidelity susceptibilities for the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>chain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study slightly generalized quantum fidelity susceptibilities where the differential change in the fidelity is measured with respect to a different term than the one used for driving the system toward a quantum phase transition. As a model system we use the spin-$1/2$ ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain. For this model, we study three fidelity susceptibilities, ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\ensuremath{\rho}}$, ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{D}$, and ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{AF}}$, which are related to the spin stiffness, the dimer order, and antiferromagnetic order, respectively. All these ground-state fidelity susceptibilities are sensitive to the phase diagram of the ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model. We show that they all can accurately identify a quantum critical point in this model occurring at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\sim}0.241{J}_{1}$ between a gapless Heisenberg phase for ${J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{c}$ and a dimerized phase for ${J}_{2}>{J}_{2}^{c}$. This phase transition, in the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless universality class, is controlled by a marginal operator and is therefore particularly difficult to observe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".