MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078041027 · doi:10.5376/ijms.2013.03.0008

Sea Surface Warming and its Implications for Harmful Algal Blooms off Oman

2013· article· en· W2078041027 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Y.V.B. Sarma, Khalid Al-Hashmi, Sharon L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marine Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgal bloomEnvironmental scienceOceanographyEffects of global warming on oceansGlobal warmingFisheryClimate changeClimatologyEcologyBiologyGeologyPhytoplanktonNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of the sea surface temperature (SST) data for the period from 1961 to 2010, showed the SST regime changes off Oman on different temporal scales. A rapid warming phase is conspicuous in the SST off Muscat and off Masirah along Oman after 1984. The shifts in the SST occurred several times on shorter time scales prior to 1984 but a notable shift in the SST occurred after 1984 when the mean annual SST increased by 0.53℃ off Masirah and by 0.32℃ off Muscat. The amplitude and period of heating/cooling are smaller and shorter off Muscat compared to Masirah with increasing summer warming and decreasing winter cooling. The multivariate ENSO index (MEI) and the annual mean SST at the study locations showed better correlation (R 2 =0.3) with April-May MEI compared to the other months. The highs and lows of SST at both the locations responded with stronger El Nino and La Nina events respectively. The frequency of harmful algal bloom (HAB) events off Oman closely followed the warming and cooling patterns of the sea surface. The frequency of HAB events increased with increasing SST during present decade (2001~2010). The increase in toxic or potentially harmful HAB events may be the consequence of upper ocean stratification forced by increasing SST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207