MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078074828 · doi:10.4161/rna.4.2.5039

Secondary Structure and Dynamics of the r(CGG) Repeat in the mRNA of the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1<i>(FMR1)</i>Gene

2007· article· en· W2078074828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
KeywordsFragile X syndromeFMR1BiologyAtaxiaGeneticsGeneRNAFragile xProtein secondary structureTrinucleotide repeat expansionUntranslated regionBase pairMessenger RNAStem-loopMolecular biologyAlleleBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CGG triplet repeat found within the 5'UTR of the FMR1 gene is involved in the pathogenesis of both fragile X syndrome and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). The repeat has been shown to form both hairpins and tetraplexes in DNA; however, the secondary structure of CGG-repeat RNA has not been well defined. To this end, we have performed NMR spectroscopy on in vitro transcribed CGG-repeat RNAs and see clear evidence of intramolecular hairpins, with no evidence of tetraplex structures. Both C*G and G*G base pairs form in the hairpin stem, though in a dynamic equilibrium of conformations. In addition, we investigated the effect of an AGG repeat interruption on hairpin stability; such interruptions are often interspersed within the CGG repeat element and are thought to modulate secondary structure of the RNA. While the AGG repeat lowers the Tm of the hairpin at low Mg2+ concentrations, this difference disappears at physiological Mg2+ levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it