Streptococcus pneumoniae endohexosaminidase D; feasibility of using N-glycan oxazoline donors for synthetic glycosylation of a GlcNAc-asparagine acceptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endohexosaminidase D, a family 85 glycoside hydrolase from S. pneumoniae and the first endohexosaminidase to be discovered, is found to be capable of catalysing the glycosylation of a glycosyl amino acid bearing a GlcNAc residue using a variety of N-glycan oxazoline donors. Although enzyme-catalysed oxazoline hydrolysis is a significant competing reaction that is not countered by the addition of organic co-solvents or variation of reaction pH, a high yielding synthetic process can be achieved by the sequential addition of multiple equivalents of oxazoline donor, demonstrating the synthetic potential of this enzyme as a biocatalyst for the synthesis of defined glycoconjugates. Notably Endo-D does not appear to hydrolyse the resulting products under the conditions used. The synthetic activity displayed by Endo D implies that other, as yet untested, family GH85 enzymes may display similar synthetic potential. Furthermore since Endo D is capable of cleaving N-glycans attached to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and also of cleaving glycans that are core-fucosylated, the development of Endo D as a useful biocatalyst for the synthesis of important defined homogeneous complex glycoconjugates may have significant future potential, provided that the limitation of direct oxazoline hydrolysis can be surmounted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".