Development of a Brief Intervention for Concerned Significant Others of Problem Gamblers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives This study identified the needs of concerned significant others (CSOs) of problem gamblers in its first phase through a focus group. Based on these findings, the Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) approach was modified into a self-help manual for CSOs of problem gamblers. In the second phase, a pilot project was designed to test the feasibility of the study design and to determine whether individuals who received the manual would show greater improvement compared with a control group. Methods Thirty-one CSOs were randomly assigned to receive the manual or a control package and were reinterviewed after three months. Variables assessed were personal and relationship functioning, number of consequences related to gambling, gambling behavior, whether the gambler entered treatment, and satisfaction with the program. Results There were no group differences found in the areas of personal and relationship functioning or consequences at the three-month interview; however, participants did display significant improvement overall. Significant group differences in favor of the treatment group were found in three areas: the proportion of participants who rated gambling as decreased, those who were satisfied with the program, and those who had their needs met. Only a small proportion in each group reported that the gambler had entered treatment. Conclusions Although the feasibility of the study was established, these preliminary results need to be interpreted cautiously and a replication and extension is currently underway. This type of brief intervention is a logical extension of the telephone support services offered to CSOs through hot lines in most North American jurisdictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".