Does Cell Size Depend on the Nuclear Genome Size in Ultra-small Algae such as Cyanidioschyzon merolae and Ostreococcus tauri?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complete nuclear genome size of the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae, 1.5–2 μm in diameter, was determined as 16.5 Mbp by our Genome Project. Based on comparing data between the correct value and the size previously described, we considered simple molecular and cytological methods to identify the correct value for genome size. The results showed that the 16.4 Mbp by the vide-enhanced photon-counting method after DAPI staining rather than pulse field electrophoresis was the closest to the Genome Project value. We determined the genome size of Ostreococcus tauri as 0.6 μm in diameter by the VIM system after staining with DAPI and SYBR Green I. The results showed that the genome size of the alga is approximately 35 Mbp and larger than the 9.0–12 Mbp estimated by pulse-field electrophoresis, suggesting that cell size does not depend on genome size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".