MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078209546 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.58.1541

Global Neutral/Alkaline Papermaking Overview-ASA sizes are highlighted-

2004· article· en· W2078209546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPapermakingChemistryPulp and paper industryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

中性/アルカリ抄造は北米,ヨーロッパで,引き続き開発され多くの紙,板紙の分野で,実施されている。現在北米では70%以上,ヨーロッパでは80%以上,中南米では65%以上が中性/アルカリ抄造化されている。排水負担の軽減や故紙の利用,填料の変更,品質の向上など,様々な理由で,中性/アルカリ抄造化に踏みきっている。これらの世界的な経験は,アジア パシフィック市場へも,基礎的な中性/アルカリ抄造技術として,提供できるであろう。また機能性,プロセス化学薬品の顕著な進歩や適用技術は,この中性/アルカリ抄造化傾向をサポートしてきた。サイズ剤,濾水歩留剤,デポジットコントロール剤等の発展である。しかしこれらの総合的な薬品適用技術が,この中性/アルカリ抄造化には必要である。さらに経済性,生産性,品質特性,環境問題も含めたトータルコーディネーション的な考え方が,中性/アルカリ抄造化には重要である。本稿ではサイズ剤の市場動向を示し,特に今日のASAサイズ剤の改良点と,実際にASAサイズ処方を適用した中性/アルカリ抄造化を実施例であげ,改善されたポイントを示した。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it