Fat and Fatty Acid Requirements and Recommendations for Infants of 0–2 Years and Children of 2–18 Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary of current recommendations for LCP intakeInstitution LCP daily recommended intake for infants 1 FAO/WHO, 1994 20 mg/kg body weight2 Agence francaise de securite sanitaire des aliments, CNERNA-CNRS, 2001 –3 Health Council of the Netherlands, 2001 80 mg/kg body weight4 Commission of the European Communities, 2006 a n–6 LCP 2% of total fat max,1% as AA. DHA 6 0.2% of total fat5 WHO/FAO, 2003 TRS 916 –6 UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition, 2004 –7 International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids, 2008 AA 0.5% of total fatDHA 0.35% of total fat8 Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Ernahrung, 2005 –9 Perinatal Lipid Intake Working Group, 2007 b DHA 6 0.2% of total fat10 Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada, 2007 c –11 World Association of Perinatal Medicine, 2008 Infant formulae and baby foods:DHA: 0.2–0.5% of fatty acids EPA≤DHA, AA≥DHA a The Commission of the European Communities. Commission Directive 2006/141/EC of 22 December 2006 on infant formu-lae and amending Directive 1999/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 30.12.2006:L401/1401/33.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".