MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078210495 · doi:10.1159/000122648

Cyclic 3’5’-Adenosine Monophosphate in the Hypothalamo-Neurohypophysial System of Normal, NaCl-Treated and Lactating Rats

2008· article· en· W2078210495 on OpenAlexaff
H. -J. Ruoff, Ron Mathison, K. Lederis

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyHypothalamusChemistryCarbacholAdenosineCyclaseVasopressinCyclic adenosine monophosphateAdenylate kinaseAcetylcholineNeurosecretionBiologyStimulationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence and production of cyclic 3', 5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) were investigated in the hypothalamus and neural lobe of the rat. Theophylline (concentrations from 10(-3) to 8 X 10(-3) M) increased the in vitro content of cAMP in the isolated neural lobe and in hypothalamic tissue samples containing supraoptic (SO) or paraventricular (PV) nuclei. Acetylcholine (ACH; 10(-2) and 10(-4) M) or carbachol (10(-4) M) did not increase cAMP content in the isolated neural lobe. Small increases were apparent (p less than 0.05, t-test for paired samples) in the hypothalamus. The amounts of cAMP were significantly higher in isolated neural lobes but not in hypothalami of NaCl-treated or lactating as compared to control rats. Presence of cAMP in the neural lobe and activation of adenylate cyclase under stimulated hormone release conditions indicate a possible involvement of cAMP in the process of neurohypophysial hormone secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207