Time-Domain Analysis of Third-Order Quantum-Dot-Based Laterally-Coupled Distributed Feedback Lasers Using Travelling-Wave Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a time-domain (TD) coupled model suitable to investigate high-order λ/4 phase-shift grating quantum-dot (QD) based laterally-coupled distributed feedback (LC-DFB) laser. First, by integrating the Streifer's coefficients, we include the effects of radiation and evanescent modes into the TD coupled wave equations, and hence we investigate the effect of the radiation modes. Then, via a well-established set of rate equations coupled with the travelling field propagation equations, population dynamics in the QD region are modeled and the homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening of, respectively, the whole QD ensemble and each QD inter-band transition are properly taken into account in the model. Finally, we consider the coupling between forward and backward electric fields due to the grating via the travelling-wave approach. This approach advances the impact of radiating partial waves in high-order QD-LC-DFB lasers. It is shown that, in particular for third-order rectangular grating, longitudinal spatial hole-burning is highly reduced, high single mode suppression ration (60 dB) is obtained and larger frequency modulation is achieved thanks to the fine engineering of the grating features and the particular properties of QD. Eventually, such results highlight the beneficial effect of considering high-order grating QD-LC-DFB lasers for better longitudinal-mode discrimination and high device performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".