Patients with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies Associated Vasculitis in Remission Are Hypercoagulable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitides (AAV) as compared to healthy subjects. The mechanisms underlying this increased occurrence of VTE are not completely understood. We hypothesize that AAV patients in remission are more procoagulant than healthy controls. METHODS: Patients with AAV in remission and no VTE for the last 6 months were included. Patients with severe renal impairment (serum creatinine > 250 μmol/l) were excluded. Age and sex matched healthy controls were included. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was determined together with hemostatic variables: fibrinogen, D-dimers, factor VIII (FVIII), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), protein C, and free protein S. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included. In 27 patients not taking anticoagulants, ETP was measured and found to be elevated: 137.1% as compared to a median of 90.0% for healthy controls (p < 0.01). Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were not elevated in patients (median 3.5 g/l and 279 μg/l, respectively). FVIII and TFPI levels were also significantly increased in patients as compared to healthy controls (159% vs 137%; 122.5% vs 101%, respectively), whereas protein C and free protein S levels were not elevated (126.5% vs 118.6% and 124.6% vs 118.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with AAV in remission are more procoagulant than healthy controls, as indicated by an increased ETP. The increased FVIII level measured in these patients suggests persistence of endothelial activation and/or dysfunction. This endothelial dysfunction may cause a continuous low-grade procoagulant state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".