On the Nature of Conformational Transition in Poly(ethylene glycol) Chains Grafted onto Phospholipid Monolayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was aimed at understanding the nature of conformational transition(s) that occur in poly(ethylene glycol) chains with molecular weight 5000 (PEG5000) grafted onto phospholipid monolayers. The study was performed with monolayers of PEG−phospholipid, DSPE−PEG5000, at the air/water interface and on solid substrates. Surface pressure and surface potential measurements together with ellipsometry and Brewster angle and atomic force microscopy were used to assess changes in the conformation and hydration of PEG5000 chains with increasing PEG grafting density. A comparative analysis of our experimental data suggests that neither the concept of the first-order pancake-to-brush conformational transition nor the model considering two subsequent transitions, namely, pancake-to-mushroom and mushroom-to-brush transitions, are adequate in describing conformational changes in the DSPE−PEG5000 monolayer at the air/water interface. At low grafting densities, PEG5000 chains did behave as grafted polymeric chains in a good solvent forming true 2D pancakes at the air/water interface. However, the conformation developed at high grafting densities was found to differ significantly from the PEG5000 brush in a good solvent. Its extension into the subphase was in far better agreement with the theoretical predictions for the height of PEG5000 brush in a theta solvent. This finding together with the decreasing absolute value of ψ 0 potential of DSPE−PEG5000 monolayer implies that conformational transition(s) in PEG5000 are accompanied by changes in interactions of PEG monomers with water molecules and by a substantial dehydration of PEG5000 chains. Conformational changes in grafted PEG5000 chains at the air/water interface are therefore interpreted as a transition from pancake to poorly hydrated brush conformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".