MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Longitudinal Study of Depression, Anxiety, Irritability, and Stress in Pregnancy Following Evidence-Based Counseling on the Use of Antidepressants

2007· review· en· W2078403866 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa O’Brien, ANNE-MARIE SCHACHTSCHNEIDER, Gideon Koren, John H. Walker, Adrienne Einarson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatric Practice · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrritabilityAnxietyDepression (economics)PregnancyMedicinePsychiatryAntidepressantObstetrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women who suffer from clinical depression and use antidepressant medications may receive conflicting information about fetal safety. Little information exists on the effect of continuation of antidepressants on depressive symptoms during pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of maintaining antidepressants during pregnancy, as measured by changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety, irritability, and stress following reassuring evidence-based counseling. METHODS: Depressed women who were pregnant and taking antidepressants, and who called the Motherisk program for advice, participated in a study that involved reassuring evidence-based counseling on the risk of antidepressants in pregnancy, followed by four telephone interviews: one in each trimester and one in the postpartum period. Depression, anxiety, irritability, and stress scales were completed at each call. RESULTS: Of the 58 women who enrolled in the study, 38 completed 75% of the follow-ups. Eight women (14%) discontinued their medication during the study. Depression scores were highest at enrollment in the first trimester and decreased as pregnancy progressed. When data from all women, regardless of dose adjustments, were analyzed, no statistically significant differences were seen between depression scores at any time point; mean depression scores were below the cut off for depression throughout the study period. Irritability, anxiety, and stress scores were not found to be statistically different at any time point during the study. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based reassurance and continuous antidepressant pharmacotherapy during gestation can provide pregnant women with effective symptom control for their depression. Women should consult their healthcare provider to ensure that they are being treated effectively; a risk/benefit assessment should be conducted on a case-by-case basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatric PracticeSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207