MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078421460 · doi:10.1121/1.4783856

Current applications of ultrasonic resonators to biomolecular studies.

2009· article· en· W2078421460 on OpenAlexaff
Tigran V. Chalikian

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressibilityResonatorNucleic acidIntermolecular forceMaterials scienceFolding (DSP implementation)Ultrasonic sensorChemical physicsChemistryThermodynamicsAcousticsPhysicsOptoelectronicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most versatile family of instruments providing the highest precision of acoustic measurements in the lowest sample volumes utilizes the method of fixed-path interferometer. The speed of sound in a medium is a simple function of its density and compressibility. Both parameters are determined by and, therefore, reflect the entire spectrum of intra- and intermolecular interactions within the system. In addition, compressibility probes the pressure response of these interactions. Current resonator-based instruments provide reliable measurements in diluted solutions of biological compounds with solute concentrations on the order of 1 mg/mL and solution volumes of 1 mL. They require less than 1 mg of sample, a range acceptable for the majority of biochemical and biophysical investigations. Ultrasonic velocimetric measurements have been employed to study a range of biologically relevant reactions, including the folding/unfolding transitions of proteins and helix-to-coil transitions of nucleic acids, as well as drug-DNA, ligand-protein, protein-protein, and protein-DNA association events. The limiting factor in such investigations is the need to rationalize the measured properties (volume, compressibility, and their derivatives) in terms of microscopic events, such as solute-solvent interactions. This presentation reviews biomolecular applications of acoustic measurements and discusses the development of approaches for microscopic interpretation of macroscopic volumetric observables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207