Relationship between FEV<sub>1</sub> and peak oxygen uptake in children with cystic fibrosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross-sectional data do not truly convey the manner in which declining lung function affects peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) within a given patient with cystic fibrosis. We hypothesized that there would be a concomitant decline in peak VO2 with FEV1 over time. Twenty-eight children aged 8-17 years with cystic fibrosis performed annual ergometer tests over a 5-year period to determine peak VO2 and within-patient predictors of change in peak VO2. Analysis was done using a mixed-effects model. During the study period, the annual decline in FEV1 averaged 2.7% of the predicted value per year. Peak VO2 fell during the observation period in 70% of patients, with an average annualized decline of 1.9 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1). This rate of decline was greater in older children in contrast to younger children, some of whom had an improvement in peak VO2 over the first few years, consistent with growth and maturation. There was no difference in this rate of decline between sexes, but girls started with a slightly lower peak VO2 (37.9 vs. 45.1 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)). In patients with FEV1 <80% predicted, declining FEV1 was highly correlated with falling peak VO2, whereas it remained stable over 4-5 years in patients whose FEV1 was >80% predicted and remained in that range. We conclude that peak VO2 remains stable or rises slightly over time in younger patients, while it shows a downward trend in older children with CF, particularly once FEV1 falls below 80% predicted. Peak VO2 is correlated with FEV1 during childhood in patients with cystic fibrosis, and both FEV1 and age influence peak VO2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it