MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078505530 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-4294

Abstract 4294: Using the zebrafish model to determine the role of the HACE1 tumor suppressor in apoptosis, cell proliferation and development

2011· article· en· W2078505530 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay McDonald, Sahar Da’as, P D’Alessandro, Poul H. Sorensen, Jason N. Berman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishBiologyMorpholinoGene knockdownTumor suppressor geneCarcinogenesisCell biologyGeneticsGeneCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract HACE1 is a novel tumor suppressor gene located at human chromosome 6q21. HACE1 possesses both ankyrin repeats and a catalytically active HECT domain. HACE1 is downregulated in a variety of human cancers including Wilms’ tumor, melanoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, lymphoma, and colon cancer, thus representing a potentially broadly applicable genetic target. While HACE1 is widely expressed in human tissues, its role in normal development remains unknown. The zebrafish has established itself as a robust model for studying vertebrate development and modeling human cancers by virtue of conserved genetics and direct evaluation of gene expression through imaging afforded by transparent embryos. A zebrafish hace1 homologue has been identified. Whole mount in situ hybridization (WISH) assays with probes to the ankyrin repeats and HECT domains demonstrate expression of zebrafish hace1 in heart, brain and kidney at early developmental time points (24 hours post-fertilization (hpf) – 7 days post-fertilization (dpf)), consistent with human expression. WISH studies in wild type embryos, employing probes to the zebrafish hace1 HECT domain and cmcl2 (heart) or cdh17 (kidney), show co-localization at early developmental time points. Moreover, morpholino knockdown of hace1 in cmcl2-GFP transgenic embryos reveals severely perturbed cardiac development and function beginning at 48 hpf, further implicating this gene in normal vertebrate cardiac development. We have also generated two transgenic zebrafish lines harboring either wild type or dominant negative mutated C876S (C876S DN) human HACE1 genes with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) tag under the control of the ubiquitous β-actin promoter. Compared to wild type embryos, we observed increased apoptosis in 28 hpf C876S DN by acridine orange and caspase 3 assays, both untreated and following irradiation-induced cellular damage. There was no statistically significant difference in cellular proliferation between wild type embryos and C876S DN by 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation (p=0.18). These results suggest that loss of HACE1 function alone is not sufficient to lead to a dysregulated cellular proliferation and implicate additional genetic lesions, such as p53 in tumor formation. C876S DN transgenic zebrafish are being crossed with p53 mutated zebrafish in order to determine the combined effect of both mutations on apoptosis, cell proliferation, and tumor formation. Further characterization of the HACE1 transgenic zebrafish model will serve to better our understanding of the role of human HACE1 in normal development and tumorigenesis. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4294. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4294

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207