MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078515968 · doi:10.1061/41016(314)99

Behavior and Design of Intermediate HBE in Steel Plate Shear Walls

2008· article· en· W2078515968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteel plate shear wallInfillStructural engineeringShear wallStiffnessShear (geology)Seismic analysisEngineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steel Plate Shear Walls (SPSW) consist of unstiffened infill steel panels surrounded by columns, called Vertical Boundary Elements (VBE), on both sides, and beams, called Horizontal Boundary Elements (HBE), above and below. These infill steel panels are allowed to buckle in shear and subsequently form a diagonal tension field. SPSW are progressively being used as the primary lateral force resisting systems in buildings. Past monotonic, cyclic and shaking table tests on SPSW in the United States, Canada, Japan, Taiwan and other countries have shown that this type of structural system can exhibit high initial stiffness, behave in a ductile manner and dissipate significant amounts of hysteretic energy, which make it a suitable option for the design of new buildings as well as for the retrofit of existing constructions. Analytical research on SPSW has also validated useful models for design and analysis of this lateral load resisting system. Recent design procedures for SPSW are provided by the CSA Limit States Design of Steel Structures and the AISC Seismic Provision for Structural Steel Buildings. Innovative SPSW designs have also been proposed and experimentally validated to expand the range of applicability of SPSW. However, some impediments still exist that may limit the widespread acceptance of SPSW. For example, little experimental information exists on the behavior of intermediate HBE in SPSW as well as the performance of such HBE having reduced beam section (RBS) connections and composite behavior. Note that intermediate HBE are those to which are welded infill steel panels above and below, by opposition to anchor HBE that have steel panels only below or above. To further address the pressing concerns regarding behavior and design of intermediate HBE, a two-phase experimental program was developed to test a two-story SPSW specimen having an intermediate composite beam with RBS connections under the collaboration of the Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER) in the U.S. and the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taipei, Taiwan. In this paper, following a brief review of the experimental observations from the MCEER/NCREE testing, the design recommendations will be presented, followed by examinations and explanations on the observed failure of the intermediate HBE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it