MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078518197 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-309032.69

B41 Social Cognition And Oxytocin In Huntington's Disease: Evidences From A Preliminary Study

2014· article· en· W2078518197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elisa Unti, Sonia Mazzucchi, Daniela Frosini, Cristina Pagni, Gloria Tognoni, Lionella Palego, Gino Giannaccini, Ubaldo Bonuccelli, Roberto Ceravolo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionSocial cognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPsychologyPopulationOxytocinNeuropsychologyDevelopmental psychologyInternal medicineAudiologyClinical psychologyMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Impaired social behaviour, partly related to altered perception of emotions, is commonly reported in HD patients. Over the past few years the role of oxytocin (OT) as social hormone has been proposed and it is supported by the improvement of recognition of the expression of the faces after administration of intranasal OT. Aims To investigate social cognition in HD and to evaluate the role of OT as social hormone. Methods 8 symptomatic HD (stage II S&F) and 9 controls, matched for age and educational level were investigated for social cognition by means of an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests. The basal levels of OT were analysed in the whole study group and searching for relationship between blood levels and social cognition. Results HD patients showed lower performances at Faux pas, Strange Stories test and in recognising face expression evaluated by KDEF scale (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). In general population younger subjects with higher education more easily recognise emotions from facial expressions. Similarly, better cognitive performance (MoCa score) well correlates with better performances on social cognitive tests. OT blood levels showed a trend for lower values in the HD group (average 7.9 ± 5.8 controls, 6.8 ± 2.6 HD). Moreover higher blood levels directly correlate with better performances on Faux Pas test. Regression analysis showed that MoCa scoring and blood OT levels were able to explain 55% about the variability of KDEF in the general population (p < 0.01), and even 70% in HD population (p < 0.05). Conclusions The present study, albeit severely limited by sample size, shows an extensive impairment of social cognition in HD population. The impairment mainly involves the perception of emotions, dependent both on the cognitive impairment and on basal levels of OT. Our finding that social cognition, at least as regards to perception of emotions, may be in part related to OT might support the hypothesis of hypothalamic involvement in HD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207