MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2078532977

La prime au travail vs La prime pour l'emploi : l'effet sur le retour à l'emploi

2010· preprint· fr· W2078532977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samir Amine

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2010
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceWelfare economicsHumanitiesSociologyEconomyEconomicsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of working poor class led the concerned countries to look for policies to reduce this poverty in the work without interfering with the flexibility of the labor market as in the case of the minimum wage legislation. In this perspective, several measures were implemented. Following the example of the Prime Pour l'Emploi adopted in France, Quebec established the Prime au Travail in order to increase the labor supply and to improve the situation of the low salaries. Nevertheless, these social policies of assistance to the poorest are generally ineffective because of externalities led on the behavior of the workers so creating the inactivity trap. In a context of economic crisis stressing the budget deficits of most of the developed countries, this article aims at estimating the effects of these two policies on the labor market participation as well as on the situation of low incomes. The entire document will be available soon. Le developpement de la classe des « working poor » a amene les differents pays concernes a chercher des moyens de lutter contre cette pauvrete au travail sans pour autant interferer avec la flexibilite du marche du travail comme peut le faire la legislation sur le salaire minimum. Dans cette perspective, plusieurs mesures ont vu le jour. Suivant l'exemple la prime pour l'emploi adoptee en France, le Quebec a instaure la prime au travail dans l'objectif d'accroitre l'offre de travail et d'ameliorer la situation des bas salaires. Neanmoins, ces politiques sociales d'assistance aux plus pauvres sont generalement inefficaces du fait des externalites induites sur le comportement des travailleurs creant ainsi une trappe d'inactivite. Dans un contexte de crise economique accentuant les deficits budgetaires de la plupart des pays developpes, ce rapport vise a evaluer les effets de ces deux dispositifs sur le retour a l'emploi ainsi que sur la situation des faibles revenus. Le document complet sera disponible ulterieurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→