MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078640073 · doi:10.3169/itej.64.335

A Mulitiple-Exposure, Linear Response, Wide-Dynamic-Range CMOS Image Sensor Combining Electric-charge Voltage Conversions in Pixel Capacitor and Column Capacitor

2010· article· en· W2078640073 on OpenAlexaff
Noriko Ide, Nana Akahane, Shigetoshi Sugawa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorCMOSPixelImage sensorDynamic rangeVoltagePhotoelectric effectElectrical engineeringWide dynamic rangeMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringPhysicsOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss the operation methods for keeping a high S/N ratio at all switching points in multiple exposures and for shorting the total integration time of a wide dynamic range (DR) lateral overflow integration capacitor (LOFIC) CMOS image sensor that combines electric-charge voltage conversions in a pixel and a column capacitor. We have used these methods on a color LOFIC CMOS image sensor. This sensor had a pixel pitch of 5.6-um and the number of effective pixels was 800 (H) x 600 (V). It was made by using 0.18-um 2P3M CMOS technology. Fully linear responses were obtained, as well as a DR of 207 dB. Furthermore, the S/N ratio was 26-dB for the image of 18% gray card at all the switching points between the multiple exposures. The total exposure time was1/13-sec and was obtained by three photoelectric conversion operations at FD and LOFIC capacitors and one photoelectric conversion operation in the column capacitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television EngineersSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207