Purine and pyrimidine metabolism during the partial drying treatment of white spruce (<i>Picea glauca</i>) somatic embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The imposition of a partial drying treatment (PDT) on mature white spruce somatic embryos is a necessary step for successful germination and embryo conversion into plantlets. Purine and pyrimidine metabolism was investigated during the PDT of white spruce somatic embryos by following the metabolic fate of 14 C‐labeled adenine, adenosine, and inosine, as purine intermediates, and orotic acid, uridine, and uracil, as pyrimidine intermediates, as well as examining the activities of key enzymes. Both the salvage and the degradation pathways of purines were operative in partially dried embryos. Adenine and adenosine were extensively salvaged by the enzymes adenine phosphoribosyltransferase and adenosine kinase, respectively. The activity of the former enzyme increased during the PDT. In both mature and partially dried embryos, a large proportion of inosine was recovered as degradation products. The de novo pathway of pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis, estimated by the incorporation of orotic acid into the nucleotides and nucleic acids, was high at the end of the maturation period and declined during the PDT. Uridine was the main substrate for the pyrimidine salvage pathway, since a large proportion of uracil was recovered as degradation products, i.e. CO 2 and β ‐ ureidopropionic acid in both mature and partially dried embryos. Uridine was mainly salvaged by uridine kinase, whose activity was found to increase during the PDT. Taken together these results indicate that the PDT might be required for increasing the activity of adenine and uridine salvage enzymes, which could contribute to the enlargement of the nucleotide pool required at the onset of germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".