MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078680641 · doi:10.4141/cjss07115

Nitrogen mineralization under summer fallow and continuous wheat in the semiarid Canadian prairie

2008· article· en· W2078680641 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
C. A. Campbell, R.P. Zentner, Prakash Basnyat, R. De Jong, R. Lemke, R. L. Desjardins

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChernozemLysimeterMineralization (soil science)Environmental scienceAgronomySummer fallowSoil waterFertilizerGrowing seasonHydrology (agriculture)BiologySoil scienceEcologyAgricultureGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability of soils to provide a portion of the N required by crops via N mineralization of organic matter is of economic and environmental importance. Over a 40-yr period (1967–2006), soil NO3-N and plant-N measurements were made under summer fallow and in systems cropped to spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), on a medium-textured Orthic Brown Chernozem (Aridic Haploboroll), at Swift Current, Saskatchewan. These values were used to estimate net N mineralization (Nmin). Each year, above-ground plant N was measured at harvest and soil NO3-N was measured before seeding, soon after harvest, and just prior to freeze-up in October. Also, in the first 18 yr of this study NO3-N and above-ground plant N were measured eight times between spring and fall in selected treatments; these data were used to make a more detailed estimate of Nmin. In a third experiment, conducted on the same soil at a nearby site in 1975, many small lysimeters were sampled six times between spring and harvest of spring wheat. We used this lysimeter study to assess the effect of N fertilizer rate and soilwater on net Nmin. Results from the more frequent sampling were more plausible than those from sampling at three different times per year. On average, net Nmin in the 20-mo summer fallow period was about 118 kg ha-1 (15 kg ha-1 between harvest and the first spring, 93 kg ha-1 between the first spring and second fall, and 10 kg ha-1 between the second fall and seeding). The average net Nmin under a wheat crop between spring and fall was between 53 and 63kg ha-1. Net Nmin increased with water, but excessive water appeared to reduce apparent net Nmin, probably due to leaching and denitrification losses of N, which were not assessed in our estimation of Nmin. Regression analysis was used to show a positive association between net Nmin and precipitation, between spring and fall, for most of the systems examined. There was evidence that tillage promotes N mineralization. At normal rates of N fertilizer (i.e., < 100 kg ha-1), fertilizer had no effect on Nmin. Net Nmin was directly proportional to fallow frequency, averaging 68, 83, and 90 kg ha-1 yr-1 for continuous wheat, fallow-wheat-wheat, and fallow-wheat rotations, respectively. Although our results may only be applicable to medium-textured soils of similar organic matter content in the Brown and Dark Brown Chernozemic soil zone, they provide data and information against which process-based models can be tested. They also provide useful first approximations of Nmin measured under field conditions where few long-term data currently exist. Key words: N mineralization, plant-N, fertilizer-N, crop rotation, irrigation, tillage

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207