Brain reorganization in patients with spinal cord compression evaluated using fMRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study characterizes the reorganization that occurs within the primary sensorimotor cortices following decompression of cervical spinal stenosis. METHODS: Twelve right-handed patients with cervical myelopathy underwent blood oxygenation level dependent functional MRI (fMRI) prior to decompression and 6 months following surgery. Ten right-handed controls also underwent fMRI. All subjects performed a finger-tapping paradigm with the right hand. Volume time course data were corrected for temporal serial correlation and % normalized before inclusion in the general linear model. Activation maps were created for each group using a threshold of p < 0.005 with Bonferroni correction. Between-group differences in left hemisphere volume of activation (VOA) were measured along the precentral gyrus (PrCG) and postcentral gyrus (PoCG). Each subject also completed clinical questionnaires. RESULTS: Prior to surgery, patients demonstrated a larger VOA (1.23 cm(3), t(max) = 11.8) in comparison to controls within the PrCG. This difference increased following surgery (2.99 cm(3), t(max) = 13.6). Within the PoCG, controls demonstrated a larger VOA (0.53 cm(3), t(max) = 8.28) than preoperative patients. This difference decreased by 0.12 cm(3) (t(max) = 7.05) following surgery. Preoperatively, patients had a 21.7 cm(3) VOA (t(max) = 29.4) within the sensorimotor cortex with the center of gravity located within Brodmann area (BA) 3. Following surgery, the VOA increased to 23.1 cm(3) (t(max) = 26.1) within BA 3. There were significant improvements in clinical outcomes following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord compression resulted in an increase in volume of activation (VOA) within the precentral gyrus (PrCG) and a loss of VOA within the postcentral gyrus (PoCG) in comparison to controls. Surgical decompression results in cortical reorganization with enlarging VOA within both the PrCG and PoCG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".