Prognostic Variables and Calcitonin in Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a nonepithelial, neuroendocrine tumor with a more aggressive clinical behavior than differentiated thyroid cancer. The purpose of the study was to review a single institution's experience with MCT since 1969. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective review of 30 patients treated for MTC at a tertiary care referral center between 1969 and 2000. There were 17 female and 13 male patients, median age at presentation was 38 years, and median follow-up for survivors was 12.4 years. RESULTS: Seventy percent of patients had sporadic MTC, 6.7% had familial MTC, 16.7% had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type IIA, and 6.7% had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type IIB. The cumulative overall survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were 97%, 88%, and 84%, respectively; disease-free survival rates were 97%, 74%, and 29%, respectively. Advanced tumor stage (P = .014) and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type IIB predicted decreased disease-specific survival. Variables affecting disease-free survival were post-thyroidectomy calcitonin level (P = .001), vascular invasion (P = .005), perineural invasion (P = .010), extrathyroidal extension (P < .001), and the presence of nodal metastases (P = .001). Locoregional control rates were 83% at 5 years and 70% at 10 years. Vascular invasion (P = .004), extrathyroidal extension (P = .008), and post-thyroidectomy basal calcitonin level (P = .003) predicted locoregional failure. Many patients in the series experienced prolonged survival despite elevated calcitonin levels. CONCLUSION: Long-term disease-free survival is uncommon in MTC, but the study data indicate that the majority of patients with MTC live for prolonged periods, despite biochemical evidence of persistent disease. Adverse pathological features such as extrathyroidal extension and vascular and perineural invasion were predictors of disease recurrence. The use of serum markers in the follow-up of patients with MTC must be interpreted within the clinical context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".