Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily improves sexual function in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and concomitant sexual dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on sexual function of alfuzosin 10 mg once daily, a uroselective alpha(1)-blocker, in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 3076 men (mean age 65.9 years) were treated for 1 year with alfuzosin 10 mg in 'real life' practice. They were asked to complete the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), its appended eighth question (bother score) and the Danish Prostatic Symptom Score questionnaire for sexual dysfunction (DAN-PSSsex). The results were analysed at the endpoint in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: At baseline, 2434 (79.1%) men were sexually active and answered correctly at least one item of the DAN-PSSsex. Sexual dysfunction was highly prevalent (reduced stiffness of erection, 65.3%; reduced volume of ejaculate, 63.2%; pain/discomfort on ejaculation, 20.2%), and was strongly related to the severity of LUTS and impairment of quality of life. At the endpoint, alfuzosin significantly improved the total IPSS (-6.1, - 32%) and bother score (-1.4, - 33.2%, both P < 0.001) over baseline. In those men with sexual dysfunction there were significant improvements in weighted scores related to reduced rigidity of erection (-0.5), reduced amount of ejaculate (-0.4) and pain/discomfort on ejaculation (-1.2, all P < 0.001) over baseline. The perceived improvements were more marked in men with severe LUTS or a severe bother score at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in men with LUTS and related to the baseline IPSS and bother score. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily for 1 year is effective in improving LUTS and quality of life, and is well tolerated. It may even improve sexual function in those men with concomitant erectile and/or ejaculatory dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".