Defining clinical remission and clinically inactive disease in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An initial Delphi survey delineated key commonalities for a standard definition of clinical remission and inactive disease in jSLE. However, several additional clarifications were still required. To develop a definition and criteria of clinical remission and inactive disease in jSLE. A second international Delphi survey was conducted among pediatric rheumatologists. Consensus was set at 75%. There were 210 respondents. Consensus was achieved regarding the key definitions under consideration (Table 1 ). Respondents also agreed that a) there should be at most one mild, non-limiting symptom; and b) there can be regular use of several systemic medications in clinical remission. There was no consensus on whether select laboratory tests could be abnormal, and whether regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with clinical remission was permissible. Consensus has been reached on the definition of ‘Clinical Remission’ and ‘Clinically Inactive Disease’ in jSLE. The results of the Delphi process will be used to guide the data-driven development of provisional criteria of clinical remission and inactive disease in jSLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.101 | 0.056 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".