MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078793942 · doi:10.1021/bi050621a

Characterization of an<i>Escherichia coli</i>Sulfite Oxidase Homologue Reveals the Role of a Conserved Active Site Cysteine in Assembly and Function

2005· article· en· W2078793942 on OpenAlexaff
S. Brokx, Richard A. Rothery, Guijin Zhang, Derek P. Ng, Joël H. Weiner

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfite oxidasePeriplasmic spaceEscherichia coliBiochemistryActive siteHemeChemistryMolybdenum cofactorCysteineSulfiteCofactorEnzymeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the biochemical and biophysical characterization of YedYZ, a sulfite oxidase homologue from Escherichia coli. YedY is a soluble catalytic subunit with a twin arginine leader sequence for export to the periplasm by the Tat translocation system. YedY is the only molybdoenzyme so far isolated from E. coli with the Mo-MPT form of the molybdenum cofactor. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal of the YedY molybdenum is similar to that of known Mo-MPT containing enzymes, with the exception that only the Mo(IV) --> Mo(V) transition is observed, with a midpoint potential of 132 mV. YedZ is a membrane-intrinsic cytochrome b with six putative transmembrane helices. The single heme b of YedZ has a midpoint potential of -8 mV, determined by EPR spectroscopy of YedZ-enriched membrane preparations. YedY does not associate strongly with YedZ on the cytoplasmic membrane. However, mutation of the YedY active site Cys102 to Ser results in very efficient targeting of YedY to YedZ in the membrane, demonstrating a clear role for YedZ as the membrane anchor for YedY. Together, YedYZ comprise a well-conserved bacterial heme-molybdoenzyme found in a variety of bacteria that can be assigned to the sulfite oxidase class of enzyme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsFrench-language works237,207