MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078835983 · doi:10.1093/imamat/hxs021

Travelling wave solutions in a non-local and time-delayed reaction-diffusion model

2012· article· en· W2078835983 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Changming Wu, Dongmei Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Applied Mathematics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaProgram of Shanghai Subject Chief ScientistUniversity of Miami
KeywordsChinaDiffusionReaction–diffusion systemVolume (thermodynamics)Library scienceOperations researchMathematicsHistoryComputer sciencePolitical sciencePhysicsLawThermodynamicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is to study the existence of travelling wave solutions in a non-local and time-delayed reaction–diffusion malaria model proposed by Lou and Zhao (2011, A reaction–diffusion malaria model with incubation period in the vector population. J. Math. Biol., 62, 543–568). We first analyse the positivity and invariance of solutions for the corresponding Cauchy problem in an unbounded domain. Then, according to the basic reproduction ratio R0 which serves as a threshold that predicts whether epidemics will spread, we show that there exist travelling wave solutions connecting the two steady states: the disease-free steady state and the endemic steady state if R0>1, and there do not exist travelling wave solutions connecting the disease-free steady state itself if R0<1. This explores how a malaria infected state invades into the previously uninfected state in the spatial domain. Numerical simulation is provided to show that the travelling wave solutions can be non-monotone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Applied MathematicsSame topicDifferential Equations and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207