Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acetaminophen is a very common drug overdose inyoung children. For the year 2001, the AmericanAssociation of Poison Control Centers reported over25,000 telephone enquiries regarding children under theage of six who were thought to have ingested anoverdose of this drug (1). Management is based upon thereported dose that has been ingested. Recommendationsfor interventions such as activated charcoal and themeasurement of the serum acetaminophen concentrationare made once a threshold dose has been exceeded. Forover a quarter of a century, the recommended thresholdhas been 150 mg/kg. The earliest literature citation thatI could find supporting this dose was from 1984 (2). Avalid threshold is required to assist poison centers inreferring to hospitals only those patients who trulyrequire the services of such facilities and to helpphysicians identify those patients who truly requireinterventions. The goal of this commentary is to assessthe validity of 150 mg/kg of acetaminophen as athreshold for interventions in a young child.MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY INYOUNG CHILDRENIt is logical to assume that this threshold is basedupon morbidity and mortality data. Although morbidityand mortality are well described after repeated dosingin young childen (3,4), the so-called therapeuticmisadventure, it is negligible after a single dose. Infact, there are no well-described deaths of childrenunder the age of six due to a single ingestion ofacetaminophen. Indeed, there are only two reports ofsevere toxicity in this age group. In 1978, Arena et al.(5) described a 14.2 kg, 40-month-old girl whoingested 11.4 g (800 mg/kg) of acetaminophen. Theserum concentration was 94 mg/L at 24h, a value thatwould be expected to produce significant hepatotoxic-ity. This occurred with her AST being 20,376 I.U. onday 3. She received supportive care and had a fullrecovery. In 1984, Lieh-Lai et al. (6) described a 12-month-old male who ingested 10.0 g of acetaminophen.Assuming a weight of 10 kg, this would amount to1000 mg/kg, a dose expected to produce significanthepatotoxicity. Despite treatment with N-acetylcys-teine, significant hepatotoxicity ensued with his ASTrising to 5,520 on day 3. He had a full recovery.Therefore this threshold dose of 150 mg/kg wasnot derived from pediatric data, as they do not exist. Alogical assumption is that it was taken from adult data.The dose of concern in an adult is 7.515.0 g (2).Assuming an adult body weight of 70 kg, and a dose ofconcern of 10.0 g, this amounts to 143 mg/kg. Thiswould seem to be the likely explanation, and Jacksonet al. commented that this figure was extrapolatedfrom adult data (2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".