MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078925043 · doi:10.1081/clt-120030939

Acetaminophen: The 150 mg/kg Myth

2004· review· en· W2078925043 on OpenAlexaff
Milton Tenenbein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxicology Clinical Toxicology · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetaminophenMedicineIngestionPsychological interventionDrug overdoseEmergency medicineAnesthesiaPediatricsToxicologyPoison controlInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acetaminophen is a very common drug overdose inyoung children. For the year 2001, the AmericanAssociation of Poison Control Centers reported over25,000 telephone enquiries regarding children under theage of six who were thought to have ingested anoverdose of this drug (1). Management is based upon thereported dose that has been ingested. Recommendationsfor interventions such as activated charcoal and themeasurement of the serum acetaminophen concentrationare made once a threshold dose has been exceeded. Forover a quarter of a century, the recommended thresholdhas been 150 mg/kg. The earliest literature citation thatI could find supporting this dose was from 1984 (2). Avalid threshold is required to assist poison centers inreferring to hospitals only those patients who trulyrequire the services of such facilities and to helpphysicians identify those patients who truly requireinterventions. The goal of this commentary is to assessthe validity of 150 mg/kg of acetaminophen as athreshold for interventions in a young child.MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY INYOUNG CHILDRENIt is logical to assume that this threshold is basedupon morbidity and mortality data. Although morbidityand mortality are well described after repeated dosingin young childen (3,4), the so-called ‘‘therapeuticmisadventure,’’ it is negligible after a single dose. Infact, there are no well-described deaths of childrenunder the age of six due to a single ingestion ofacetaminophen. Indeed, there are only two reports ofsevere toxicity in this age group. In 1978, Arena et al.(5) described a 14.2 kg, 40-month-old girl whoingested 11.4 g (800 mg/kg) of acetaminophen. Theserum concentration was 94 mg/L at 24h, a value thatwould be expected to produce significant hepatotoxic-ity. This occurred with her AST being 20,376 I.U. onday 3. She received supportive care and had a fullrecovery. In 1984, Lieh-Lai et al. (6) described a 12-month-old male who ingested 10.0 g of acetaminophen.Assuming a weight of 10 kg, this would amount to1000 mg/kg, a dose expected to produce significanthepatotoxicity. Despite treatment with N-acetylcys-teine, significant hepatotoxicity ensued with his ASTrising to 5,520 on day 3. He had a full recovery.Therefore this threshold dose of 150 mg/kg wasnot derived from pediatric data, as they do not exist. Alogical assumption is that it was taken from adult data.The dose of concern in an adult is 7.5–15.0 g (2).Assuming an adult body weight of 70 kg, and a dose ofconcern of 10.0 g, this amounts to 143 mg/kg. Thiswould seem to be the likely explanation, and Jacksonet al. commented that this figure was ‘‘extrapolated’’from adult data (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Toxicology Clinical ToxicologySame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207