MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078937812 · doi:10.1136/ebmh.6.3.93

Clozapine may be more effective than olanzapine for reducing suicidal behaviour in people with schizophrenia at high risk

2003· letter· en· W2078937812 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Volavka

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Mental Health · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizoaffective disorderClozapineOlanzapineMedicineWeb of scienceSuicidal ideationPsychiatryInternal medicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PediatricsPsychosisPoison controlSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meltzer HY, Alphs L, Green AI et al. Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia. International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT). Arch Gen Psychiatry2003 , Jan; 60 : 82 –91 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: Compared with olanzapine, how effective is clozapine for preventing suicidal behaviour among people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder? Randomised open label trial with masked outcome raters. 67 centres in 11 countries (Argentina, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States); March 1998 - February 2001. 980 people aged 16–65 years with schizophrenia (62%) or schizoaffective disorder (38%) considered at high risk for suicide based on current suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or preventive hospitalisation within 3 years. Mean age 37 years; 39% women; 71% white; 27% treatment refractory. Participants were randomised to receive olanzapine or clozapine daily. The mean daily doses of olanzapine and clozapine prescribed were 16.6 mg and 274.2 … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DArchives%2Bof%2BGeneral%2BPsychiatry%26rft.stitle%253DArch%2BGen%2BPsychiatry%26rft.aulast%253DMeltzer%26rft.auinit1%253DH.%2BY.%26rft.volume%253D60%26rft.issue%253D1%26rft.spage%253D82%26rft.epage%253D91%26rft.atitle%253DClozapine%2BTreatment%2Bfor%2BSuicidality%2Bin%2BSchizophrenia%253A%2BInternational%2BSuicide%2BPrevention%2BTrial%2B%2528InterSePT%2529%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1001%252Farchpsyc.60.1.82%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F12511175%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.82&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=12511175&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F6%2F3%2F93.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180286800010&link_type=ISI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based Mental HealthSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207