MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078942140 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-09-10159-4

An optimal limiting 2𝐷 Sobolev inequality

2009· article· en· W2078942140 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrei Biryuk

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMcMaster University
KeywordsLimitingMathematicsInequalitySobolev spacePure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal of this paper is to prove an optimal limiting Sobolev inequality in two dimensions for Hölder continuous functions. Additionally, from this inequality we derive the double logarithmic inequality <disp-formula content-type="math/mathml"> \[ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-vertical-bar u double-vertical-bar Subscript upper L Sub Superscript normal infinity Baseline less-than-or-slanted-equals StartFraction double-vertical-bar nabla u double-vertical-bar Subscript upper L squared Baseline Over StartRoot 2 pi alpha EndRoot EndFraction NestedTwiceStartRoot ln left-parenthesis 1 plus 6 StartRoot 2 pi alpha EndRoot StartFraction double-vertical-bar u double-vertical-bar Subscript ModifyingAbove normal upper C With dot Sub Superscript alpha Subscript Baseline Over double-vertical-bar nabla u double-vertical-bar Subscript upper L squared Baseline EndFraction NestedStartRoot ln left-parenthesis 1 plus StartRoot 2 pi alpha EndRoot StartFraction double-vertical-bar u double-vertical-bar Subscript ModifyingAbove normal upper C With dot Sub Superscript alpha Subscript Baseline Over double-vertical-bar nabla u double-vertical-bar Subscript upper L squared Baseline EndFraction right-parenthesis NestedEndRoot right-parenthesis NestedTwiceEndRoot"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> ∞ </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo> ⩽ </mml:mo> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> ∇ </mml:mi> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> </mml:msqrt> </mml:mfrac> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mi>ln</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ⁡ </mml:mo> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-OPEN"> <mml:mo maxsize="1.623em" minsize="1.623em">(</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mstyle> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> </mml:msqrt> <mml:mstyle displaystyle="false" scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="true" stretchy="true" symmetric="true"/> <mml:mspace width="negativethinmathspace"/> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mover> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ˙ </mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="true" stretchy="true" symmetric="true"/> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mspace width="negativethinmathspace"/> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> ∇ </mml:mi> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false"> ‖ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mstyle> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mi>ln</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ⁡ </mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicNonlinear Partial Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207