Extracellular H+ dynamics during oogenesis in<i>Rhodnius prolixus</i>ovarioles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spatiotemporal dynamics of transmembrane hydrogen ion (H+) fluxes during oogenesis were investigated in the telotrophic ovarioles of the insect, Rhodnius prolixus. Although Rhodnius ovarioles possess exaggerated morphological and electrical polarity between nurse cells and oocytes, little is known about H+ changes during oogenesis, despite the regulatory role played by H+ and pH in many relevant cellular processes. A number of dynamic extracellular H+ fluxes were measured along Rhodnius ovarioles, representing an oogenesis cycle, using a non-invasive, self-referencing, H+-selective probe. The interfollicular stalk separating adjacent follicles exhibited prominent H+ efflux that peaked during midvitellogenesis and declined during late vitellogenesis. H+ efflux in this region preceded stalk formation and, importantly, preceded the onset of vitellogenesis in the adjacent posterior follicle. H+ efflux was also observed over the terminal follicle, where specialized regions of the chorion were forming, and was still detected around follicle cells after ovulation, indicating that the somatic follicular epithelium produced this flux. Transmembrane H+ fluxes may drive intracellular pH changes or may stabilize pHi in response to pH-altering events. H+ fluxes may play a role in processes that coincide spatially and temporally, including the onset of vitellogenesis, endocytosis, follicle cell cytoskeletal dynamics, and regulation of interfollicular feedback mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".