Incidence and prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Catalonia (Spain)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the incidence and prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Catalonia (autonomous region in northeast Spain), examined according to the currently established disease subtypes. METHODS: Before initiating the study, we conducted an educational programme on paediatric rheumatology, addressed to all general paediatricians in Catalonia. A 2-year (2004-2006), prospective, population-based study was then carried out to determine the incidence of JIA. Prospective and retrospective data retrieval was performed to calculate prevalence. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR, Edmonton revision) classification criteria were applied. RESULTS: Over the study period, 145 new cases of JIA were diagnosed. The mean annual incidence was 6.9/10⁵ children aged less than 16 years (range 5.8-8.1 years; 9.0 years for girls and 4.8 years for boys). On separate analysis of patients ≤ 6 and > 6 years, the distribution in younger children was found to be similar for both girls and boys, whereas in older children, most girls belonged to the oligoarthritis and polyarthritis subgroups, and boys to the enthesitis-related arthritis and undifferentiated subgroups. The calculated prevalence of JIA (31 October 2006) was 39.7 (36.1-43.7)/10⁵ children younger than 16. The relative risk of girls having JIA was 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-2.7, p < 0.001]. In 70% of patients, the diagnosis was established before the age of 7. Subgroup distribution of prevalent cases mirrored that of incident cases. CONCLUSION: This is the first population-based study on the epidemiology of JIA in Catalonia. Incidence and prevalence rates are lower than those reported for several areas in Nordic countries of Europe. Oligoarthritis was the most common subtype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it