MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079000976 · doi:10.1076/orbi.19.4.253.2654

Wegener's granulomatosis: The ocular manifestations revisited

2000· article· en· W2079000976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrbit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpiscleritisScleritisPrednisoloneDermatologyRetrospective cohort studyOphthalmologyKeratitisSystemic diseaseSurgeryDiseaseUveitisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM. To investigate whether the extent of ocular morbidity had de-creased as a result of improved diagnosis, awareness and treatment of Wegener 's granulomatosis (WG). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective study of all patients with ophthalmic involvement due to WG over an 8-year period. RESULTS. Forty-nine patients were diagnosed to have WG. Of these, 28 had ocular involvement: 21 patients had focal ocular involvement (conjunctivitis, episcleritis, scleritis, keratitis, iritis, retinitis)and 7 had orbital involvement. Permanent visual loss occurred in three patients with orbital involvement, but in no patients with focal ocular disease. Up to 90% of patients had systemic involvement. Three deaths oc- curred among those with ocular involvement. CONCLUSIONS. Patients with WG have a much improved visual prog- nosis as a result of early diagnosis and intervention with systemic im- munosuppression. A combination of assays for ANCA and tissue biop-sies were needed to establish the diagnosis of WG. Treatment with immunosuppressive agents (usually prednisolone and cyclophospha- mide)led to a good response in the majority of cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it