MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079034889 · doi:10.1080/10739680802425195

Role of α4β1 Integrins in Chemokine‐Induced Monocyte Arrest under Conditions of Shear Stress

2008· review· en· W2079034889 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon J. Hyduk, Myron I. Cybulsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyMonocyteIntegrinChemokineCell adhesion moleculeChemistryCell adhesionReceptorAdhesionBiologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monocyte recruitment or emigration to tissues is an essential component of host defense in both acute and chronic inflammatory responses. Sequential molecular interactions mediate a cascade of tethering, rolling, arrest, stable adhesion, and intravascular crawling that culminates in monocyte diapedesis across the vascular endothelium and migration through the basement membrane of postcapillary venules. Integrins are complex adhesion and signaling molecules. Dynamic alterations in their conformation and distribution on the monocyte cell surface are required for many steps of monocyte emigration. Intracellular signaling initiated by chemokine receptors induces conformational changes in integrins that upregulate their affinity for ligands, and this is essential for monocyte arrest. This review focuses on the activation of monocyte alpha4beta1 integrins by endothelial chemokines, which is required for the arrest of monocytes rolling on vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 under shear flow. Using soluble ligand-binding assays and adhesion assays in parallel-plate flow chambers, critical signaling mediators in chemokine-induced alpha4beta1 integrin affinity upregulation and monocyte arrest have been identified, including phospholipase C, calcium, and calmodulin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocirculationSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207