EFFECT OF PRETREATMENT CONDITIONS ON STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF WHEAT STRAW
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structural characteristics of lignocellulosic biomass such as surface area, pore volume, crystallinity, hemicellulose, and lignin content significantly affect the yield of fermentable sugars for bioethanol production. In the present work, the effect of dilute acid pretreatment was studied on structural characteristics of wheat straw, using different combinations of process variables (temperature, time, and acid concentration). Pretreated wheat straw (PWS) exhibited higher available surface area and pore volume along with low hemicellulose and lignin content. Crystallinity index (CrI) of biomass at different pretreatment conditions showed an increased trend followed by sharp decrease at high temperature (190°C) conditions. Maximum increase in surface area (7.1 m2/g compared to 4.0 m2/g for untreated wheat straw) was obtained at pretreatment conditions of 180°C temperature, 0.5% (v/v) acid, and 7 min time. SEM imaging of biomass revealed that pore breaking, compression of pores, and partial pore blocking in the case of high temperature (190°C) pretreatment conditions may be the reason behind decreased surface area of biomass. FT-IR analysis showed almost complete hemicellulose removal and acid-soluble lignin removal after dilute acid pretreatment but insufficient removal of acid insoluble lignin. [Supplementary material is available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Chemical Engineering Communications for the following free supplemental resource: figure showing XRD pattern of biomass with respect to different pretreatment conditions.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it