MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079116548 · doi:10.1086/508517

A Photometric Search for Planets in the Open Cluster NGC 7086

2006· article· en· W2079116548 on OpenAlexaff
J. M. Rosvick, R. M. Robb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaDominion Astrophysical ObservatoryThompson Rivers UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDistance modulusAstrophysicsOpen clusterPhotometry (optics)AstronomyPlanetStarsLight curvePlanetary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an attempt to discover short-period, Jupiter-mass planets orbiting solar-type stars in open clusters, we searched for planetary transits in the populous and relatively unstudied open cluster NGC 7086. A color-magnitude diagram constructed from new B and V photometry is presented, along with revised estimates of the cluster's color excess, distance modulus, and age. Several turnoff stars were observed spectroscopically in order to determine a color excess of E(B - V) = 0.83 ± 0.02. Empirically fitting the main sequences of two young open clusters and the semiempirical zero-age main sequence of Vandenberg and Poll yielded a distance modulus of (V - MV) = 13.4 ± 0.3 mag. This corresponds to a true distance modulus of (m - M)0 = 10.8 mag or a distance of 1.5 kpc to NGC 7086. These values were used with isochrones from the Padova group to obtain a cluster age of 100 Myr. Eleven nights of R-band photometry were used to search for planetary transits. Differential magnitudes were constructed for each star in the cluster. Light curves for each star were produced on a night-to-night basis and inspected for variability. No planetary transits were apparent; however, some interesting variable stars were discovered: a pulsating variable that appears to be a member of the γ Dor class and four possible eclipsing binary stars, one of which actually may be a multiple system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207