L’application de la spiritualité bénédictine au loisir des personnes âgées : un modèle théorique du bonheur spirituel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de cette réflexion théologique est de montrer, à l’aide d’un modèle théorique, comment l’application de la spiritualité bénédictine au loisir des personnes âgées peut favoriser le bonheur spirituel. L’analyse s’est articulée notamment autour d’un syllogisme. Le cœur de la spiritualité bénédictine est la contemplation. Or, les personnes âgées sont tout naturellement disposées à la réminiscence, à l’introspection et à la contemplation. Donc, la spiritualité bénédictine convient particulièrement au loisir des personnes âgées. Quatre valeurs bénédictines ont été retenues, à savoir la fraternité, la modération, l’hospitalité et l’humilité. Dans le modèle, la spiritualité bénédictine est reliée à la contemplation, à l’union avec Dieu et au bonheur spirituel. Par ailleurs, la spiritualité bénédictine, le loisir contemplatif et les personnes âgées sont interreliés; en plus, les personnes âgées et le loisir contemplatif sont directement reliés à la contemplation. Bref, il s’agissait de jeter un regard bénédictin sur le loisir, le vieillissement et le bonheur. The purpose of this theological reflection is the application of Benedictine spirituality to the leisure of older people. Based on a syllogism, it presupposes that the heart of Benedictine spirituality is contemplation. Hence, older people are predisposed to reminiscence, introspection and contemplation. Therefore, Benedictine spirituality is particularly appropriate for the leisure of older people. Four Benedictine values were selected namely fraternity, moderation, hospitality and humility. Also in a proposed theoretical model, Benedictine spirituality is related to contemplation, union with God and spiritual happiness. Furthermore, Benedictine spirituality, contemplative leisure and older people are all interrelated while older people and contemplation are directly related to contemplation. Essentially, this paper aimed at providing a monastic outlook on happiness, aging and contemplative leisure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".