Diabetic rats and mice are resistant to porcine and human insulin: flawed experimental models for testing islet xenografts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Islet transplantation is potentially a promising therapy for the restoration of carbohydrate control to diabetic patients. However, the global application of islet transplantation requires a ubiquitous source of beta cells. The xenotransplantation of porcine islets would provide such a source. Success in porcine islet xenografting has been achieved in diabetic primates. However, there are few reports of reversal of diabetes with porcine islet xenografts in rodent models of diabetes, relative to the number of successful rodent experiments performed as allografts. Here we report for the first time the inability of porcine (and human) insulin to control blood glucose levels in diabetic rodents determined by a series of dose escalating studies. METHODS: Insulin was administered intravenously to streptozotocin induced diabetic Lewis rats, Balb/c and athymic Balb/c mice (n = 5 per group) at the following doses: Group I "physiological dose" (pd) of 0.16 U/kg for a total dose of 40 mU to a 250 g rat. Group II received 0.64 U/kg (4xpd), group III 1.6 U/kg (10xpd) and group IV 6.4 U/kg (40xpd). Blood glucose levels were monitored in each animal at seven time points: 0 (pre-injection), 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h and 3 h post-injection. Serum insulin levels were also determined. RESULTS: Diabetic Lewis rats achieved a maximum reduction in blood glucose from 22.1 +/- 1.8mmol/l to 8.0 +/- 3.1 mmol/l (a 63.7% reduction), 90 minutes post-injection of 6.4 U/kg dose of porcine insulin (40xpd). Human insulin was less effective at reducing blood glucose levels in rats than porcine insulin (P < 0.001). Porcine insulin reduced blood glucose levels in Balb/c mice from a mean of 18.2 +/- 2.1 mmol/l to a hypoglycemic minimum of 1.26 +/- 0.18 mmol/l a reduction of 93.0%, 60 min post-injection of the maximum dose of 6.4 U/kg. Balb/c mice were significantly more responsive to porcine insulin than Lewis rats at doses of 0.64 U/kg (P < 0.001), 1.6 U/kg (P < 0.05) and 6.4 U/kg (P < 0.001). Athymic Balb/c nude mice reached a maximum reduction in blood glucose from 21.6 +/- 1.8 mmol/l to 3.6 +/- 0.9 mmol/l (a 83.4% reduction) 120 min post-injection at a dose of 6.4 U/kg. Overall, athymic Balb/c nude mice were more resistant to porcine insulin than immunocompetent Balb/c mice at doses of 0.64 U/kg (P < 0.001), 1.6 U/kg (P < 0.001) and 6.4 U/kg (P < 0.05). Insulin diluent alone marginally increased blood glucose levels in all animals tested. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that restoration of normoglycemia in diabetic rodents is not ideal for testing porcine islets xenografts since the reversals of diabetes in these species requires 20 to 40 times the dose of porcine insulin used in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".