Relationship Between Pre-Tips Liver Perfusion by The Portal Vein and The Incidence of Post-Tips Chronic Hepatic Encephalopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the present study we evaluated the predictive value of pretransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) portal perfusion as assessed by Doppler ultrasonography for the onset of chronic encephalopathy after TIPS. METHODS: A total of 231 cirrhotic patients were followed-up prospectively after TIPS placement. The pattern of intrahepatic portal flow was assessed before TIPS. Patients were divided into two groups according to Doppler findings. Group 1 comprised patients with prograde portal flow (n = 200), whereas group 2 comprised those with loss of portal perfusion (hepatofugal or back-and-forth flow or portal vein thrombosis; n = 31). The presence of chronic encephalopathy during a median follow-up of 32 months was prospectively recorded. The prognostic value of the following parameters for the onset of chronic recurrent encephalopathy after TIPS was evaluated: age, presence of encephalopathy before TIPS, alcoholism, Pugh score, and loss of portal perfusion before TIPS. The independent prognostic value of each variable was tested with a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, incidence of prior episodes of hepatic encephalopathy, and portacaval gradient before and after the procedure; however, liver failure was more severe in patients in group 2 (Pugh score: 9.2 +/- 1.9 vs 10.3 +/- 1.7). The 3-yr survival was identical for both groups; 25% of the 200 patients in group 1 developed chronic encephalopathy as compared to 6% of the 31 patients in group 2 (p = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that loss of portal perfusion and age >65 yr were the only independent predictors of the onset of post-TIPS chronic encephalopathy (odds ratios 0.24 and 1.98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotic patients with loss of portal perfusion before TIPS were protected against post-TIPS chronic hepatic encephalopathy despite a more severe liver dysfunction at baseline. The only other independent predictive factor for the onset of this complication was age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".