MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079188570 · doi:10.1115/detc2004-57789

Vibration Analysis of Axially Loaded Beams Including Rotary Inertia: An Exact Dynamic Finite Element

2004· article· en· W2079188570 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed M. Hashemi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAxial symmetryRotary inertiaFinite element methodCantileverVibrationBeam (structure)Virtual workTimoshenko beam theoryTrigonometric functionsInertiaStiffnessBending stiffnessDirect stiffness methodBendingStructural engineeringStiffness matrixMathematical analysisPhysicsMechanicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsEngineeringAcousticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ‘exact’ basis function Dynamic Finite Element (DFE) for the free vibrational analysis of axially loaded beams and assemblages composed of beams is presented. The shear deformation is neglected but the Rotary Inertia (RI) effects are taken into consideration. The dynamic trigonometric shape functions for bending vibrations of an axially loaded uniform beam element are first derived in an exact sense. Then, exploiting the Principle of Virtual Work together with the nodal approximations of variables based on these dynamic shape functions, leads to a single frequency dependent Dynamic Stiffness Matrix (DSM) that represents both mass and stiffness properties. A Wittrick-Williams algorithm, based on a Sturm sequence root counting technique, is then used as the solution method. The application of the theory is demonstrated by an illustrative example of cantilever beam where the influence of Rotary Inertia (RI) effect and different axial loads on the natural frequencies of the system is demonstrated by numerical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207