MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2079188897 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.1122

P3–052: Brains for Dementia Research: MMSE profile of the living cohort

2013· article· en· W2079188897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gillian R. Hayes, Richard Hudspith, Paul T. Francis

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentClinical Dementia RatingCohortGeriatric Depression ScaleGerontologyPsychiatryCognitionMedicineMoodMini–Mental State ExaminationRating scaleMemory clinicActivities of daily livingDiseasePsychologyPathologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) is a network of six UK brain banks/collection centres that aims to address the shortage of high-quality post-mortem brains from people with dementia and suitable control cases and provide researchers with detailed clinical information on each case. Post-mortem brains are critical to our understanding of neurodegenerative processes in dementia and the underlying causes of the symptoms observed. With increasing research sophistication two things are clear: (1) the value of relating clinical information obtained during life to post-mortem biochemistry, and (2) genetic association studies require large numbers of samples from clinically, histopathologically and biochemically characterised tissue. Since BDR began in 2008 nearly 1,800 people in the UK have signed up to take part in regular assessments and agreed to donate their brain. For those with a diagnosis of dementia the following tests of memory, noncognitive behavior, mood and function will be undertaken: Mini Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale, Cornell/Geriatric Depression Scale, Hachinski Ischaemic Scoring System Sensory/Motor Impairment. For controls, the same panel of tests will be used with the option of employing the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) cognitive battery. These tests will berepeated annually for those with a diagnosis of dementia, while the frequencyfor those without dementia will every 2 to 5 years. The average age of the living cohort is 76 made up of 547 males and 986 females. Approximately 21% (329) have a diagnosis of dementia. 55% of the cohort had MMSE values obtained in the last 3 years. The distribution of MMSE scores is shown in Figure 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→