MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079237958 · doi:10.1149/1.1506933

The Effects of Chloride Ions on the Electrowinning of Nickel from Sulfate Electrolytes

2002· article· en· W2079237958 on OpenAlexafffund
Akram Alfantazi, A. Shakshouki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsElectrowinningChlorideNickelElectrolyteInorganic chemistryScanning electron microscopeSulfateChemistryElectrochemistryIonMaterials scienceElectrodeComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the effects of chloride ions on the electrowinning of nickel from sulfate electrolytes has been studied. Specifically, the influence of the chloride ion concentration in the range of 0-1000 mg/L on the current efficiency, and power consumption of electrowinning, surface morphology, and preferred orientation of nickel deposits have been determined. The current efficiency increased while the power consumption decreased in the presence of chloride ions over the concentration range studied, the maximum being 1000 mg/L. X-ray diffraction analysis of the nickel deposits produced from electrolytes with chloride ions indicated the presence of (111), (200), (220), (311), (400), (331), and (222) orientation, with a slight (200) and (220) preferred orientation. By using scanning electron microscopy changes in the surface morphology and appearance of the nickel deposits were also observed as a result of chloride ion additions. © 2002 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrodeposition and Electroless CoatingsFrench-language works237,207