Kaidun meteorite: Crystals of oxides in cavities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cavities in two texturally and genetically distinct clasts of the Kaidun meteorite were found out to contain crystals of distinct morphology, but of a similar composition. Cavities in chondrite breccia #d3A contain thin (<4 μm) elongated (up to 25 μm long) crystals that grew perpendicular to the walls of the cavity. The walls of the cavities in partly fused clast #d(3–5)D are covered with clusters of acicular crystals. In both clasts, the crystals are covered by films of phyllosilicates and always have a composition approximated by the formula (Mg,Fe,Mn) 5 Al 2 O 8 · n H 2 O. No mineral phase of this composition has ever been found in nature. The genesis of the mineral phases in the cavities is thought to be related to the crystallization from a fluid of similar composition. The fluid was produced during the cooling of the melt that produced clast #d(3–5)D. The unusual composition of the crystals testifies that this fluid had an unusual composition. This can be explained by the unique nature of clast #d(3–5)D, for which there are good reasons to propose a Martian origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".