MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079288375 · doi:10.1253/circj.72.441

Association Between Ankle - Brachial Index and Risk Factor Profile in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Intermittent Claudication

2008· article· en· W2079288375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntermittent claudicationInternal medicineCreatinineRisk factorDiabetes mellitusLipid profileRenal functionOutpatient clinicClaudicationC-reactive proteinBlood pressureCardiologyVascular diseaseCholesterolArterial diseaseEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of the present study was to determine whether there is an association between the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and the risk factor profile in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral arterial disease (PAD). A secondary objective was to identify the risk factor profile of these patients, and evaluate how well these factors are controlled in the primary care setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, all new consecutive patients referred by primary care to a vascular surgery outpatient clinic, after diagnosis of PAD was confirmed, were subsequently referred to the Risk Factor Modification Clinic for assessment and management of their risk factors. Patients with intermittent claudication (n=170) (age 68.7+/-10.6 years; 118 men; ABI 0.65+/-0.13) were included. In patients not on lipid-lowering drugs, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was inversely correlated with the ABI (r= -0.42, p<0.0001). Also ABI was significantly correlated with serum creatinine (rs= -0.38, p<0.0001) (and estimated glomerular filtration rate), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (rs= -0.20, p=0.009) and plasma fibrinogen (rs= -0.18, p=0.018). In stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, hsCRP and creatinine levels and diabetes were independent predictors of ABI (p<0.0001). Only 32.4% of the patients had normal blood pressure and 25.9% had an optimal LDL-C level <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dl); 85.3% were ever smokers; 44.1% had diabetes/impaired fasting glucose; 84.7% had hsCRP >3.0 mg/L; 78.8% fibrinogen >3.0 g/L (300 mg/dl); and 68.8% homocysteine >12.0 micromol/L (44.7% >15.0 micromol/L). CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, a significant inverse correlation between ABI and LDL-C was shown in patients not on lipid-lowering drugs, and also between ABI and creatinine, hsCRP and fibrinogen in all patients, supporting a link between the severity of PAD and atherogenic and inflammatory risk factors. HsCRP, creatinine and diabetes were independently associated with the ABI. Despite the increased vascular risk, PAD remains undertreated in the primary care setting. Increased awareness will overcome this barrier to effective secondary prevention of vascular events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it