Interaction of Daunomycin with Acetylated Chromatin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthracyclines are powerful chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of many cancers. In many instances, they are currently used in combination with histone deacetylase inhibitors in order to enhance their efficiency. Not surprisingly and as part of their mode of action, these drugs interfere with gene expression, a process that has long been known to be mediated by histone acetylation. In this paper, we use analytical ultracentrifuge analysis, equilibrium dialysis, and circular dichroism to characterize the role of histone acetylation on the binding of antharcyclines to chromatin. We show that histone acetylation enhances the daunomycin-induced DNA dissociation from nucleosomes and decreases the extent of aggregation that results from the interaction in a way that is modulated by the presence or absence of linker histones. Histone acetylation increases the binding affinity of daunomycin by chromatin. Furthermore, the binding of anthracycline to acetylated chromatin sheds additional light into the conformational chromatin alterations resulting from core histone acetylation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".