MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2079360025 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-943

Abstract 943: Characterization of RET and integrin signaling in thyroid tumors

2012· article· en· W2079360025 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Lian, Jessica Cockburn, Sonal Varma, Steven J.M. Jones, Victor A. Tron, Sam M. Wiseman, Lois M. Mulligan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyroid carcinomaThyroidCancer researchTissue microarrayMedullary carcinomaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retBiologyTyrosine kinaseIntegrinNeural crestPathologyMedicineReceptor tyrosine kinasePhenotypeImmunohistochemistryInternal medicineReceptorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The REarranged in Transfection (RET) tyrosine kinase is important during development of neural crest derived tissues such as the enteric and sympathetic nervous systems, but is also activated in multiple human tumour types. Activating mutations of RET play an important role in thyroid cancers including both papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). More broadly, recent studies have also shown that RET may be active in other tumour types such as pancreatic and breast cancers, and that the overexpression and activation of RET may be linked to more aggressive disease. In order to explore this link, we have investigated the expression of RET in a large cohort of over 400 thyroid tumour samples of multiple histologies, ranging from benign lesions through to aggressive, metastatic disease by immunhistochemistry using a thyroid tissue microarray. Our data suggest that RET expression may correlate with more aggressive phenotype across a broader spectrum of tumours than previously predicted. We are currently investigating this association further; first by examining the expression of two major RET protein isoforms, RET9 and RET51, in this panel of tumours, and second, by investigating the coexpression of RET with another group of proteins associated with tumour progression, the integrin family. In preliminary studies, we have evaluated RET coexpression with two integrin subunits, ITGB1 and ITGB3. Our data suggest correlation between tumour aggressiveness and coexpression of RET with these integrin subunits. Together, our data provides insight on the role of RET in increasing aggressiveness over a range of tumours. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 943. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-943

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→