MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079381279 · doi:10.1097/bpo.0b013e318165214f

Displaced Olecranon Fractures in Children

2008· article· en· W2079381279 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Parent, Michelle Wedemeyer, Andrew Mahar, Megan Anderson, Frances D. Faro, Suzanne Steinman, François Lalonde, Peter O. Newton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOlecranonElbowSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Wire and suture methods have been used to stabilize pediatric olecranon fractures. This study (1) compared differences in simulated intraoperative compression during fracture reduction, (2) evaluated articular surface compression during cyclic loading of the tension band, and (3) compared fracture stabilization after cyclic physiologic loading at low/high levels. METHODS: Identical olecranon fractures were created in 10 synthetic ulnae and randomized to suture or wire fixation. Compression after fixation and compression during cyclic loading between 10 and 50 N was measured with a load cell at the articular surface and compared with a 1-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Twenty-four fractured synthetic ulna were randomly assigned to wire or suture tension band constructs and low- or high-loading groups. The low-load group (12 ulnae) cycled loading from 3 to 10 N for 100 cycles followed by a failure test. The high-load group (12 ulnae) experienced 10 to 100 N before failure testing. Fracture separation (mm) and failure load (N) were compared using a 2-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Ten synthetic ulnae were randomized to wire/suture groups and cyclically loaded between 10 to 50 N while measuring loads across the fracture using a load cell. Correlation data were statistically compared with a Fisher transformation and z test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Residual compression was statistically greater for wire compared with suture. There was no difference in fracture displacement between groups during low loads. Suture had significantly greater displacement compared with wire at high loads. Failure loads were significantly greater for wire at both load settings. Wires transmitted forces across the joint surface more readily than sutures. CONCLUSIONS: Suture tension bands had lower ultimate failure loads and less compression at the fracture site. However, if low loads are expected or if the fracture is reduced easily, the suture tension band may be an appropriate alternative to wire fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Perhaps, in small children or when using casts in bigger children, a bioabsorbable suture may be used for fracture stabilization avoiding the need for extensive surgery to remove the fixation material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric OrthopaedicsSame topicElbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentFrench-language works237,207